Four weeks left to prepare PAYE submissions


Taxpayers have just four weeks to prepare for the SA Revenue Service’s interim pay as you earn (PAYE) submission season, which commences on 1 September. There are important changes that will affect the PAYE reconciliation and submission process.

New legislation that took effect in March this year means medical aid contributions are no longer allowed as a tax deduction for employees under the age of 65. The medical aid capped amounts have also been replaced with medical aid tax credits.

“Companies that have not applied medical aid tax credits for the first six months of the tax year must correct this before they process their last payroll run this month (August),” says Laurica Kok, general manager at Softline Pastel Payroll.

“Those that do not have the correct medical aid legislation in place when submitting interim tax certificates will find that SARS will reject their submissions and they could face penalties for incorrect or late submissions.”

Kok adds that individual income tax reference numbers must be reflected in each submission. If one or more tax certificates do not include the tax reference number, the overall submission will be rejected.

“There are other important changes that will affect interim PAYE reconciliation submissions. These include a new interest rate for low or interest-free loans fringe benefits. Following the July reduction in the repo rate, companies must ensure that they apply the new official interest rate of 6% when calculating fringe benefits for August 2012.”

A new IT3(a) Reason code for tax certificates has been introduced by SARS for non-deduction of PAYE and must be applied on interim tax certificates. Code 08 will indicate a zero PAYE liability due to medical aid tax credits applied.

There are also new source codes for fringe benefits and tax deductions that must be applied to interim tax certificates, replacing the consolidated values SARS required prior to the 2012 tax year.

“Companies using up-to-date automated payroll software will find that all of these SARS PAYE requirements are implemented automatically, ensuring submission compliance.”

via Companies have just four weeks left to prepare SARS interim PAYE submissions | ITWeb.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Keep your tax payments uptodate

President's Advisory Panel for Federal Tax Reform

Image via Wikipedia

The  South African Revenue Service (SARS) has extensive powers to collect tax. These powers are contained in various tax laws and are intended to facilitate the prompt collection of tax that is due. There have been a number of court cases dealing with the limitations of SARS’ collection powers.

The Western Cape High Court recently gave judgment in a case dealing with SARS’ collections powers. The case related to a judgment obtained by SARS against Fastmould Specialist CC in respect of Value-Added Tax (VAT) and employees’ tax. The VAT Act and the Income Tax Act both contain provisions allowing SARS to obtain judgments against taxpayers by filing a statement with the clerk or registrar of any competent court. The taxpayer is not afforded an opportunity to oppose the granting of the judgment.

via Court affirms SARS’ power to collect tax

Common SMEs tax mistakes

Tax nightmares among owner-managed businesses and SMEs are costly and time consuming, particularly relating to tax queries and disputes with the South African Revenue Services (Sars).

By simply implementing key preventative administrative steps, business owners can actively avoid or at least reduce the risk of these tax mistakes from arising.

Inaccurate accounting information Mistake

The accuracy of the underlying accounting information and supporting documentation  is directly responsible for the integrity of a taxpayer‘s income tax return.  In the case of SMEs, this integrity is often queried as a result of a lean accounting function and  confusion in distinguishing  between the financial affairs of the business owner and the business.

Sars tax auditors are first and foremost focused on testing the reliability of accounting books and records, by, for example, reviewing cash accounting records for unusually large or ad hoc payments, on the basis that these often represent private expenses which have been processed as business expenses and  claimed for tax purposes.

The importance of accurate accounting information and supporting documentation is further compounded by tax regulations requiring taxpayers to maintain proof of all income and expenditure as well as maintaining  business documentation in a particular format, for example,   VAT invoices.

via Moneywebtax – Common SMEs tax mistakes – PAYE and SITE.

Taxation of tips from satisfied customers

In our Tax Alert dated 18 February 2011, we discussed the South African Revenue Service’s Binding Class Ruling No 27 (BCR 27), which dealt with the question of whether there is a liability on an employer to withhold pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) from tips received by the employees from satisfied customers.

Based on the particular circumstances the ruling provided that the transfer of the tips from the employer’s bank account into the employee’s bank accounts will not constitute the payment of “remuneration” as contemplated in paragraph 2(1) of the Fourth Schedule to the Income Tax No 58 of 1962 (the Act) and would thus not be subject to PAYE.

Some confusion recently arose around the application of BCR 27 with reports in the media stating that the effect of the ruling was that tips paid by an employer to an employee are not taxable (which will obviously create a stir). This confusion prompted the release of the updated BCR 27 which specifically confirms that the ruling does not mean that tips received by employees under the circumstances as described in the ruling, nor for that matter tips received in general, are not taxable. Amounts received by way of tips constitute “gross income” as defined in section 1 of the Act and will, therefore, be subject to income tax in the hands of the recipient. The fact of the matter is that tips (as contemplated in the ruling) will not constitute “remuneration” as defined in the Fourth Schedule, which merely releases an employer from the obligation to withhold employee’s tax from these amounts, but does not release the recipient from the obligation to declare such tips for income tax purposes.

BCR 27 does not address the issue that the recipients should be aware that if the employer does not deduct PAYE from the tips, the employee may still be required to register as a provisional taxpayer. A provisional taxpayer under the Fourth Schedule to the Act includes any person who derives by way of income any amount which does not constitute remuneration or an allowance otherwise contemplated in section 8(1), but excludes a person exempt from the payment of provisional tax in terms of paragraph 18 of Fourth Schedule to the Act. In this regard, paragraph 18 of the Fourth Schedule specifically excludes any natural person who does not derive any income from carrying on any business, if the taxable income of that person for the relevant year of assessment will not exceed the tax threshold.

For instance, the tax threshold for the 2012 year of assessment for an individual under the age of 65 is R59 750. If such a person earns taxable income (not limited to tips) in excess of R59 750, such person will be required to register as a provisional taxpayer. It is therefore important to appreciate that:

while tips received by employees may not constitute “remuneration” for purposes of the Fourth Schedule to the Act, such tips may in any event be taxable (ie provided the total taxable income of the individual exceeds the relevant threshold); and
the recipient may be required to register as a provisional taxpayer and make payments for provisional tax on 31 August and 28/29 February each year, as the case may be.
In the end, the additional administrative consequences for a recipient of tips which are not subject to PAYE and where such recipient is required to register as a provisional taxpayer may prove to be more of a nightmare than if the PAYE had simply been deducted by the employer.

via Taxation of tips from satisfied customers – Lexology